Families' Distress Over Coastal Erosion Threatening Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.
A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards
Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”
Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles
One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.
“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril
Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.
“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”
In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Searching for Answers and Clarity
The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.
Some want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.
“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”
A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”
He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”
The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.